Insights into the timing of repeated testing after treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis: data and modelling study

• Published in: Sexually transmitted infections Vol. 89; no. 1; pp. 57 - 62
• Main Authors: Heijne, Janneke Cornelia Maria, Herzog, Sereina Annik, Althaus, Christian Lorenz, Tao, Guoyu, Kent, Charlotte Kathleen, Low, Nicola
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.02.2013; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; chlamydia; chlamydia infection; Chlamydia trachomatis; Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification; control; deterministic model; epidemiology; Female; health service research; HIV; Humans; Lymphogranuloma Venereum - diagnosis; Lymphogranuloma Venereum - drug therapy; Lymphogranuloma Venereum - epidemiology; mathematical model; Models, Statistical; Neisseria gonorrhoea; notification; preventive health services; Sexual Behavior; sexual health; STD surveillance; Time Factors; United States - epidemiology; women; Young Adult; United States
• ISSN: 1368-4973; 1472-3263; 1472-3263
• DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050468

Objectives The objective of this study was to determine the optimal time interval for a repeated Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) test. Methods The authors used claims data for US women aged 15–25 years who were enrolled in commercial health insurance plans in the MarketScan database between 2002 and 2006. The authors determined the numbers of initial positive and negative tests that were followed by a repeated test and the positivity of repeated tests. The authors used a dynamic transmission pair model that reflects the partnership formation and separation processes in 15–25 year olds to determine the time course of repeated infections in women under different levels of notifying the current partner. The authors then explored the additional impact of repeated testing uptake on reducing chlamydia prevalence. Results 40% (4949/12 413) of positive tests were followed by a repeated test compared with 22% (89 119/402 659) of negative tests at any time. Positivity of repeated tests followed by an initial positive test was high: 15% (736) after a positive test versus 3% (2886) after a negative test. The transmission model showed a peak in repeated infections between 2 and 5 months after treatment. For a chlamydia testing uptake of 10% per year, the additional impact of repeated testing on reducing chlamydia population prevalence was modest. Conclusions The mathematical model predictions support the recommended interval for repeat chlamydia testing. This study provides information that can be used to design randomised controlled trials to determine more effective interventions to prevent chlamydial reinfection.