Association of lipoprotein(a) levels with recurrent events in patients with coronary artery disease

• Published in: Heart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 106; no. 16; pp. 1228 - 1235
• Main Authors: Liu, Hui-Hui, Cao, Ye-Xuan, Jin, Jing-Lu, Zhang, Hui-Wen, Hua, Qi, Li, Yan-Fang, Guo, Yuan-Lin, Zhu, Cheng-Gang, Wu, Na-Qiong, Gao, Ying, Xu, Rui-Xia, Hong, Li-Feng, Li, Jian-Jun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.08.2020; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Angina pectoris; Angioplasty; Apolipoproteins; Blood pressure; Body mass index; Cardiac risk factors and prevention; Cardiovascular disease; Cholesterol; coronary artery disease; Coronary vessels; Diabetes; Disease prevention; Ejection fraction; Heart surgery; Hemoglobin; High density lipoprotein; Hospitals; Hypertension; Lipoproteins; Lipoproteins and hyperlipidaemia; Medical imaging; Patients; Statins; Studies; Variables; Vein & artery diseases; coronary artery disease; Lipoproteins and hyperlipidaemia; cardiac risk factors and prevention
• ISSN: 1355-6037; 1468-201X; 1468-201X
• DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316586

ObjectiveWhether lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a predictor for recurrent cardiovascular events (RCVEs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been established. This study, hence, aimed to examine the potential impact of Lp(a) on RCVEs in a real-world, large cohort of patients with the first cardiovascular event (CVE).MethodsIn this multicentre, prospective study, 7562 patients with angiography-diagnosed CAD who had experienced a first CVE were consecutively enrolled. Lp(a) concentrations of all subjects were measured at admission and the participants were categorised according to Lp(a) tertiles. All patients were followed-up for the occurrence of RCVEs including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke.ResultsDuring a mean follow-up of 61.45±19.57 months, 680 (9.0%) RCVEs occurred. The results showed that events group had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than non-events group (20.58 vs 14.95 mg/dL, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that Lp(a) tertile 2 (p=0.001) and tertile 3 (p<0.001) groups had significantly lower cumulative event-free survival rates compared with tertile 1 group. Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis further revealed that Lp(a) was independently associated with RCVEs risk (HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.44 to 2.80, p<0.001). Moreover, adding Lp(a) to the SMART risk score model led to a slight but significant improvement in C-statistic (∆C-statistic: 0.018 (95% CI: 0.011 to 0.034), p=0.002), net reclassification (6.8%, 95% CI: 0.5% to 10.9%, p=0.040) and integrated discrimination (0.3%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 0.7%, p<0.001).ConclusionsCirculating Lp(a) concentration was indeed a useful predictor for the risk of RCVEs in real-world treated patients with CAD, providing additional information concerning the future clinical application of Lp(a).