Influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on respiratory function during chronic beta blockade: comparison of propranolol and pindolol

The long term effect of beta blockers and the influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on respiratory function were assessed in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris randomised to receive treatment with propranolol (n = 21) or pindolol (n = 19) for one year. Forced expiratory volume in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.) Vol. 293; no. 6539; pp. 97 - 99
Main Authors Northcote, R J, Ballantyne, D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 12.07.1986
British Medical Association
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The long term effect of beta blockers and the influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on respiratory function were assessed in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris randomised to receive treatment with propranolol (n = 21) or pindolol (n = 19) for one year. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) had fallen by a mean of 240 ml after one year (p less than 0.001) in those treated with propranolol compared with 120 ml in those treated with pindolol (p less than 0.05). The difference between the groups was significant (p less than 0.01). Vital capacity fell significantly only in those treated with propranolol (p less than 0.05 at one year). In those in whom the basal ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity was low (less than 70%) propranolol, but not pindolol, caused a significant (p less than 0.05) fall in FEV1 throughout treatment. Long term administration of pindolol has a less adverse effect on respiratory function than propranolol, which results in a progressive deterioration in respiratory function over one year.
Bibliography:PMID:3089433
ark:/67375/NVC-KSJBSMN6-5
href:bmj-293-97.pdf
local:bmj;293/6539/97
istex:EA7BBA11286BE5B5D7CE1724E7E2EC77C2602FB6
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0267-0623
1468-5833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.293.6539.97