Clinical and intravascular imaging outcomes at 1 and 2 years after implantation of absorb everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in small vessels. Late lumen enlargement: does bioresorption matter with small vessel size? Insight from the ABSORB cohort B trial

Background The long-term results after second generation everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) placement in small vessels are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of vessel size on long-term outcomes, after Absorb BVS implantation. Methods In ABSORB Cohort B Trial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 99; no. 2; pp. 98 - 105
Main Authors Diletti, Roberto, Farooq, Vasim, Girasis, Chrysafios, Bourantas, Christos, Onuma, Yoshinobu, Heo, Jung Ho, Gogas, Bill D, van Geuns, Robert-Jan, Regar, Evelyn, de Bruyne, Bernard, Dudek, Dariusz, Thuesen, Leif, Chevalier, Bernard, McClean, Dougal, Windecker, Stephan, Whitbourn, Robert J, Smits, Pieter, Koolen, Jacques, Meredith, Ian, Li, Xiaolin, Miquel-Hebert, Karine, Veldhof, Susan, Garcia-Garcia, Hector M, Ormiston, John A, Serruys, Patrick W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.01.2013
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The long-term results after second generation everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) placement in small vessels are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of vessel size on long-term outcomes, after Absorb BVS implantation. Methods In ABSORB Cohort B Trial, out of the total study population (101 patients), 45 patients were assigned to undergo 6-month and 2-year angiographic follow-up (Cohort B1) and 56 patients to have angiographic follow-up at 1-year (Cohort B2). The pre-reference vessel diameter (RVD) was <2.5 mm (small-vessel group) in 41 patients (41 lesions) and ≥2.5 mm (large-vessel group) in 60 patients (61 lesions). Outcomes were compared according to pre-RVD. Results At 2-year angiographic follow-up no differences in late lumen loss (0.29±0.16 mm vs 0.25±0.22 mm, p=0.4391), and in-segment binary restenosis (5.3% vs 5.3% p=1.0000) were demonstrated between groups. In the small-vessel group, intravascular ultrasound analysis showed a significant increase in vessel area (12.25±3.47 mm2 vs 13.09±3.38 mm2 p=0.0015), scaffold area (5.76±0.96 mm2 vs 6.41±1.30 mm2 p=0.0008) and lumen area (5.71±0.98 mm2 vs 6.20±1.27 mm2 p=0.0155) between 6-months and 2-year follow-up. No differences in plaque composition were reported between groups at either time point. At 2-year clinical follow-up, no differences in ischaemia-driven major adverse cardiac events (7.3% vs 10.2%, p=0.7335), myocardial infarction (4.9% vs 1.7%, p=0.5662) or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (2.4% vs 8.5%, p=0.3962) were reported between small and large vessels. No deaths or scaffold thrombosis were observed. Conclusions Similar clinical and angiographic outcomes at 2-year follow-up were reported in small and large vessel groups. A significant late lumen enlargement and positive vessel remodelling were observed in small vessels.
Bibliography:href:heartjnl-99-98.pdf
istex:392C4466844B3D18377BC59B41E0EF3F500048BD
XL, KM-H and SV are employed by Abbott Vascular
local:heartjnl;99/2/98
ArticleID:heartjnl-2012-302598
ark:/67375/NVC-V10QH5F8-8
PMID:23118346
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302598