Permanent pacemaker implantation following isolated aortic valve replacement in a large cohort of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis

ObjectivesTo assess the incidence of conduction disturbances leading to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) in a large cohort of elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, and to determine the predictive factors and prognostic value...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 97; no. 20; pp. 1687 - 1694
Main Authors Bagur, Rodrigo, Manazzoni, Juan Maria, Dumont, Éric, Doyle, Daniel, Perron, Jean, Dagenais, François, Mathieu, Patrick, Baillot, Richard, Charbonneau, Éric, Metrás, Jacques, Mohammadi, Siamak, Côté, Mélanie, Philippon, François, Voisine, Pierre, Rodés-Cabau, Josep
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.10.2011
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectivesTo assess the incidence of conduction disturbances leading to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) in a large cohort of elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, and to determine the predictive factors and prognostic value of PPI following AVR in such patients.MethodsA total of 780 consecutive elderly patients (age 77±4 years, logistic EuroSCORE 10.4±8.5%, STS score 3.5±1.5%) with severe aortic stenosis and no previous pacemaker were analysed.Main outcome measuresThe incidence, clinical indications, timing and predictive factors of PPI within 30 days after AVR and their prognostic value were evaluated.ResultsBaseline ECG showed the presence of conduction abnormalities in 37.1% of the patients. Twenty-five patients (3.2%) needed PPI during the index hospitalisation due to the occurrence of complete atrioventricular block (2.6%) or severe bradycardia (0.6%). The presence of preprocedural left bundle branch block (OR 4.65, 95% CI 1.62 to 13.36, p=0.004) or right bundle branch block (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.47 to 12.03, p=0.007) predicted the need for PPI after AVR. The need for PPI was associated with a longer hospital stay (p<0.0001). Thirty-day mortality rates were similar between patients with and without PPI (4% vs 3.2%, p=0.56). Survival rate at 5-year follow-up was 75%, with no differences between patients with and without PPI (p=0.12).ConclusionsThe need for PPI following isolated AVR in elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis was low. Pre-existing bundle branch block predicted the need for PPI. PPI determined a longer hospital stay, but had no effect on acute and long-term mortality.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-8PTTBRNJ-W
ArticleID:heartjnl-2011-300308
istex:8D32C8FF643EBCE9AE6F38C65235D91A3073933D
href:heartjnl-97-1687.pdf
PMID:21828221
local:heartjnl;97/20/1687
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300308