Clinical and moral uncertainty in psychiatry: the problem of scarce resources

In practice, this means that detaining and forcing treatment on patients with serious mental disorders can only be deemed appropriate when any immediate harm is outweighed by long term benefit. [...]patients demonstrate that they have the capacity to control rather than to be controlled by their tur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPostgraduate medical journal Vol. 85; no. 1008; pp. 507 - 508
Main Authors Doyal, Len, Doyal, Lesley, Sokol, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine 01.10.2009
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In practice, this means that detaining and forcing treatment on patients with serious mental disorders can only be deemed appropriate when any immediate harm is outweighed by long term benefit. [...]patients demonstrate that they have the capacity to control rather than to be controlled by their turbulent emotional storms, their vulnerability should take priority over any concern about levels of autonomy already compromised by illness. [...]the physical environment of care should be designed to reinforce those other means of optimising the autonomy of patients.\n Under these circumstances it will not always be clear morally where clinical convenience ends and necessity begins.
Bibliography:ArticleID:pj89862
PMID:19789187
istex:4AE3CC9F0A2D592D4083EE01D0EEE78E19BF1DEC
ark:/67375/NVC-FLL5M6W2-T
Related-article-href:10.1136/pgmj.2009.081596
local:postgradmedj;85/1008/507
href:postgradmedj-85-507.pdf
SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:0032-5473
1469-0756
DOI:10.1136/pgmj.2009.089862