Characteristics and long-term outcome of echocardiographic super-responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: ‘real world’ experience from a single tertiary care centre

BackgroundThe individual benefit from cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) varies largely among patients.AimsTo compare different definitions of echocardiographic super-response to CRT regarding their ability to predict the incidence of adverse events.MethodsThree definitions of super-response to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 97; no. 20; pp. 1668 - 1674
Main Authors Steffel, Jan, Milosevic, Gligor, Hürlimann, Anja, Krasniqi, Nazmi, Namdar, Mehdi, Ruschitzka, Frank, Lüscher, Thomas F, Duru, Firat, Holzmeister, Johannes, Hürlimann, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.10.2011
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
EBM
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundThe individual benefit from cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) varies largely among patients.AimsTo compare different definitions of echocardiographic super-response to CRT regarding their ability to predict the incidence of adverse events.MethodsThree definitions of super-response to CRT were evaluated in 110 consecutive patients with CRT implantation: (1) an absolute increase in ejection fraction of ≥10%; (2) a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume of ≥30%; and (3) a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic volume of ≥20%. The primary endpoint was a combination of time to death, heart transplantation, ventricular assist device implantation and hospitalisation for heart failure. Secondary endpoints included time to first appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) discharge during follow-up.ResultsAll three definitions of super-response were highly predictive of a reduced risk for reaching the primary combined endpoint (3-year estimators: 64%±7% vs 82%±7% for ejection fraction ≥10%; 63%±8% vs 92%±5% for end-systolic volume ≥30%; and 62%±8% vs 94%±4% for end-diastolic volume ≥20%; all p<0.001). In all three analyses, super-responders had a significantly shorter time from diagnosis of heart failure until the time point of CRT implantation. However, even super-responders, independent of the definition, did experience appropriate ICD discharges during follow-up.ConclusionsAll three definitions of super-response are highly predictive for a favourable outcome after CRT. However, even patients with pronounced reverse left ventricular remodelling experience appropriate ICD discharges during follow-up.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-TB5B0SQ0-L
local:heartjnl;97/20/1668
istex:94C6C7354BC24DFBC5FDC2934E9308A35F46DC0E
ArticleID:heartjnl-2011-300222
href:heartjnl-97-1668.pdf
PMID:21821856
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300222