PandAcuity in paediatrics: a novel clinical measure of visual function based on the panda illusion

• Published in: British journal of ophthalmology Vol. 107; no. 4; pp. 582 - 586
• Main Authors: Kelbsch, Carina, Spieth, Bettina, Zrenner, Eberhart, Besch, Dorothea, Straßer, Torsten
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.04.2023; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Subjects: Animals; Child; child health (paediatrics); Children & youth; Clinical Science; Diabetic retinopathy; diagnostic tests/Investigation; Humans; Illusions; Intellectual disabilities; Male; Medical diagnosis; Pediatrics; Perceptions; Preschool children; psychophysics; Reproducibility of Results; vision; Vision Tests - methods; Vision, Low; Visual Acuity; visual perception; vision; diagnostic tests/Investigation; visual perception; child health (paediatrics); psychophysics
• ISSN: 0007-1161; 1468-2079
• DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319935

Background/aimsTo evaluate the PandAcuity test for visual function testing in a paediatric cohort and to examine its agreement with conventional visual acuity (VA) testing.MethodsPandAcuity scores were determined in 152 children (77 males) aged between 3 and 15 years after VA testing (LEATM-test, E-chart, Landolt-C-rings or numbers). The PandAcuity test consisted of illusions made up from silhouettes of animals ‘hidden’ within zig-zag-patterns of decreasing spatial frequencies. Correlation analyses between PandAcuity score and VA were performed.Results150 children completed the test in at least one eye, 148 in both eyes. The PandAcuity test demonstrated good test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.89) between two runs. VA and PandAcuity score showed a medium to large correlation (Spearman’s ρ=0.52, p<0.0001). 93% of the children’s visual impairment was classified in the same range by both test types. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of predicted visual impairment showed an excellent agreement with the classification based on VA testing (AUC=0.84).ConclusionThe PandAcuity test is rapid, simple and well accepted, rendering it a suitable supplement for the clinical assessment of VA in children. Because of its counterintuitive application (a higher number of correctly identified images means worse VA), it can be used to cross-validate conventional acuity tests to assure children’s compliance.