Assessment of Shock Collars as Nonlethal Management for Wolves in Wisconsin

Lethal control alone has not proven entirely effective in reducing gray wolf (Canis lupus) depredations in chronic problem areas. Opponents of lethal control argue that more emphasis should be placed on integrating nonlethal strategies into current management. However, few evaluations have tested th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of wildlife management Vol. 73; no. 4; pp. 518 - 525
Main Authors Hawley, Jason E, Gehring, Thomas M, Schultz, Ronald N, Rossler, Shawn T, Wydeven, Adrian P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK The Wildlife Society 01.05.2009
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lethal control alone has not proven entirely effective in reducing gray wolf (Canis lupus) depredations in chronic problem areas. Opponents of lethal control argue that more emphasis should be placed on integrating nonlethal strategies into current management. However, few evaluations have tested the effectiveness of nonlethal options. We compared behavior patterns in terms of frequency and duration of bait station visits for 5 wolves fitted with shock collars to 5 control animals inhabiting wolf pack territories in northern Wisconsin during summers of 2003 and 2004. Shock collared wolves spent less time and made fewer visits to bait station zones than did control animals. During and after shocking, wolves shifted 0.7 km away from the bait station zone. Although active shocking did restrict wolf access, which could be useful in controlling wolf depredations during a limited time period, conditioning was not clearly demonstrated once shocking ceased. The effect of shock collar design and operation on long-term conditioning and shock-conditioned wolves on pack behavior needs further study. If long-term conditioning is possible, shock collars could be used by wildlife managers as a nonlethal wolf management method in chronic problem areas where lethal control has proven ineffective.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.2193/2007-066
istex:6C49E53D9D69FEC95A55C1850B85475AF53A028C
ArticleID:JWMG440
ark:/67375/WNG-0QSJT3GP-H
State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Sessions Woods Wildlife Management Area, P.O. Box 1550, Burlington, CT 06013, USA
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-541X
1937-2817
DOI:10.2193/2007-066