Rare, protein-truncating variants in ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2, but not XRCC2, are associated with increased breast cancer risks

BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women and has a major heritable component. The risks associated with most rare susceptibility variants are not well estimated. To better characterise the contribution of variants in ATM, CHEK2, PALB2 and XRCC2, we sequenced their coding r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical genetics Vol. 54; no. 11; pp. 732 - 741
Main Authors Decker, Brennan, Allen, Jamie, Luccarini, Craig, Pooley, Karen A, Shah, Mitul, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Ahmed, Shahana, Baynes, Caroline, Conroy, Don M, Brown, Judith, Luben, Robert, Ostrander, Elaine A, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dunning, Alison M, Easton, Douglas F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.11.2017
BMJ Publishing Group
SeriesOriginal article
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women and has a major heritable component. The risks associated with most rare susceptibility variants are not well estimated. To better characterise the contribution of variants in ATM, CHEK2, PALB2 and XRCC2, we sequenced their coding regions in 13 087 BC cases and 5488 controls from East Anglia, UK.MethodsGene coding regions were enriched via PCR, sequenced, variant called and filtered for quality. ORs for BC risk were estimated separately for carriers of truncating variants and of rare missense variants, which were further subdivided by functional domain and pathogenicity as predicted by four in silico algorithms.ResultsTruncating variants in PALB2 (OR=4.69, 95% CI 2.27 to 9.68), ATM (OR=3.26; 95% CI 1.82 to 6.46) and CHEK2 (OR=3.11; 95% CI 2.15 to 4.69), but not XRCC2 (OR=0.94; 95% CI 0.26 to 4.19) were associated with increased BC risk. Truncating variants in ATM and CHEK2 were more strongly associated with risk of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive than ER-negative disease, while those in PALB2 were associated with similar risks for both subtypes. There was also some evidence that missense variants in ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2 may contribute to BC risk, but larger studies are necessary to quantify the magnitude of this effect.ConclusionsTruncating variants in PALB2 are associated with a higher risk of BC than those in ATM or CHEK2. A substantial risk of BC due to truncating XRCC2 variants can be excluded.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-2593
1468-6244
DOI:10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104588