Efficacy and safety of monotherapy with sirukumab compared with adalimumab monotherapy in biologic-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (SIRROUND-H): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational, 52-week, phase 3 study

ObjectiveThis randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 study compared monotherapy with sirukumab, an anti–interleukin-6 cytokine monoclonal antibody, with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsBiologic-naïve patients with active RA who were inadequate resp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 77; no. 5; pp. 658 - 666
Main Authors Taylor, Peter C, Schiff, Michael H, Wang, Qingmin, Jiang, Yusang, Zhuang, Yanli, Kurrasch, Regina, Daga, Shruti, Rao, Ravi, Tak, Paul P, Hsu, Benjamin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.05.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectiveThis randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 study compared monotherapy with sirukumab, an anti–interleukin-6 cytokine monoclonal antibody, with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsBiologic-naïve patients with active RA who were inadequate responders or were intolerant to, or inappropriate for, methotrexate were randomised to subcutaneous sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks (n=187), sirukumab 50 mg every 4 weeks (n=186) or adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks (n=186). Primary endpoints at week 24 were change from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response; these endpoints were tested in sequential order. This study is registered at EudraCT (number: 2013-001417-32) and ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT02019472).ResultsSignificantly greater improvements from baseline in mean (SD) DAS28 (ESR) were observed at week 24 with sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks (−2.96 (1.580)) versus adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks (−2.19 (1.437); P<0.001). Sirukumab 50 mg every 4 weeks also showed significantly greater improvement from baseline at week 24 in DAS28 (ESR) (−2.58 (1.524)) compared with adalimumab (P=0.013). The ACR50 response rates with the 100 mg (35.3%) and 50 mg (26.9%) doses of sirukumab were comparable to that with adalimumab (31.7%) at week 24. The safety profile of sirukumab was consistent with that observed with anti–interleukin-6 receptor antibodies. A dose-related effect on the incidence of injection-site reactions was observed with sirukumab.ConclusionSirukumab monotherapy showed greater improvements in DAS28 (ESR), but similar ACR50 response rates, versus adalimumab monotherapy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212496