A randomised crossover study comparing bimatoprost and latanoprost in subjects with primary angle closure glaucoma

Background/aims:To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy and side effects of latanoprost 0.005% and bimatoprost 0.03% in subjects with chronic primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).Methods:This was an observer-masked randomised crossover study of 60 PACG subjects who received eith...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 93; no. 6; pp. 782 - 786
Main Authors How, A C S, Kumar, R S, Chen, Y-M, Su, D H, Gao, H, Oen, F T, Ho, C-L, Seah, S K, Aung, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.06.2009
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background/aims:To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy and side effects of latanoprost 0.005% and bimatoprost 0.03% in subjects with chronic primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).Methods:This was an observer-masked randomised crossover study of 60 PACG subjects who received either latanoprost or bimatoprost for 6 weeks, after which they were crossed over to the other medication for another 6 weeks. The IOP-reducing effect of the medications was assessed by the reduction in IOP after 6 weeks of treatment compared with baseline.Results:Fifty-four subjects (80 eyes) completed the study. Latanoprost reduced IOP (mean (SD)) by 8.4 (3.8) mm Hg and bimatoprost by 8.9 (3.9) mm Hg from a baseline of 25.2 (3.6) mm Hg and 25.2 (3.6) mm Hg respectively (p = 0.23). Adverse events were mild in both groups; however there were twice as many reports of an adverse event in the bimatoprost group (81%) compared with the latanoprost group (40%, p<0.01). Ocular irritation was the most frequently reported adverse event in both groups; 22 subjects (37.9%) treated with bimatoprost experienced ocular hyperaemia as compared with 13 subjects (22.4%) treated with latanoprost (p = 0.11).Conclusions:Bimatoprost once daily was similarly effective in reducing IOP compared with latanoprost once daily in subjects with chronic PACG. Both drugs were well tolerated with mild ocular adverse events.
Bibliography:href:bjophthalmol-93-782.pdf
ArticleID:bj144535
ark:/67375/NVC-8KR3QFB1-K
PMID:19336424
local:bjophthalmol;93/6/782
istex:E5C4962F1EACF590735EFA92E59B46C7A429C072
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.2008.144535