Quantitation of faecal Fusobacterium improves faecal immunochemical test in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia

ObjectiveThere is a need for an improved biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma. We evaluated faecal microbial markers for clinical use in detecting CRC and advanced adenoma.DesignWe measured relative abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (Pa) a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 66; no. 8; pp. 1441 - 1448
Main Authors Wong, Sunny H, Kwong, Thomas N Y, Chow, Tai-Cheong, Luk, Arthur K C, Dai, Rudin Z W, Nakatsu, Geicho, Lam, Thomas Y T, Zhang, Lin, Wu, Justin C Y, Chan, Francis K L, Ng, Simon S M, Wong, Martin C S, Ng, Siew C, Wu, William K K, Yu, Jun, Sung, Joseph J Y
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.08.2017
BMJ Publishing Group
SeriesOriginal article
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectiveThere is a need for an improved biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma. We evaluated faecal microbial markers for clinical use in detecting CRC and advanced adenoma.DesignWe measured relative abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Peptostreptococcus anaerobius (Pa) and Parvimonas micra (Pm) by quantitative PCR in 309 subjects, including 104 patients with CRC, 103 patients with advanced adenoma and 102 controls. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers with respect to faecal immunochemical test (FIT), and validated the results in an independent cohort of 181 subjects.ResultsThe abundance was higher for all three individual markers in patients with CRC than controls (p<0.001), and for marker Fn in patients with advanced adenoma than controls (p=0.022). The marker Fn, when combined with FIT, showed superior sensitivity (92.3% vs 73.1%, p<0.001) and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.95 vs 0.86, p<0.001) than stand-alone FIT in detecting CRC in the same patient cohort. This combined test also increased the sensitivity (38.6% vs 15.5%, p<0.001) and AUC (0.65 vs 0.57, p=0.007) for detecting advanced adenoma. The performance gain for both CRC and advanced adenoma was confirmed in the validation cohort (p=0.0014 and p=0.031, respectively).ConclusionsThis study identified marker Fn as a valuable marker to improve diagnostic performance of FIT, providing a complementary role to detect lesions missed by FIT alone. This simple approach may improve the clinical utility of the current FIT, and takes one step further towards a non-invasive, potentially more accurate and affordable diagnosis of advanced colorectal neoplasia.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
SHW and TNYK contributed equally.
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312766