Illusions regarding Helicobacter pylori clinical trials and treatment guidelines

Development of H. pylori therapy differs from other infectious diseases. Since the advent of antibiotics, infectious diseases therapy has been susceptibility based, whereas most H. pylori treatment guidelines recommend susceptibility testing only after two empiric therapy failures. The susceptibilit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 66; no. 12; pp. 2043 - 2046
Main Author Graham, David Y
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Development of H. pylori therapy differs from other infectious diseases. Since the advent of antibiotics, infectious diseases therapy has been susceptibility based, whereas most H. pylori treatment guidelines recommend susceptibility testing only after two empiric therapy failures. The susceptibility of etiologic bacteria is almost never known at the time an infected patient is enrolled in a clinical trial that evaluates initial antimicrobial treatment. [...]the comparator drugs chosen for study in antibacterial clinical trials are selected because they are anticipated to be effective against all, or almost all, strains likely to be encountered during conduct of the study. The differences between regimens relate to differences in the prevalence of clarithromycin resistance in the population (range 0% to 20%). Because the trial results are population specific, they were not generalisable. Comparisons among trials where differences are dependent on the presence of antibiotic resistance populations are invalid. Because study-specific results cannot be generalised, they should not be published, quoted nor used for meta-analyses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314744