Adverse health effects of environmental chemical agents through non-genotoxic mechanisms

Many of these compounds are now suspected or have already been demonstrated to be capable of modulating cellular receptor responses involved in physiological signal cascades by mimicking or counteracting endogenous receptor ligands. Besides typical hormone receptors-such as those that govern cellula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of epidemiology and community health (1979) Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 1 - 3
Main Authors Henkler, Frank, Luch, Andreas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.01.2011
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many of these compounds are now suspected or have already been demonstrated to be capable of modulating cellular receptor responses involved in physiological signal cascades by mimicking or counteracting endogenous receptor ligands. Besides typical hormone receptors-such as those that govern cellular responses to physiological levels of oestrogens, androgens, progesterone, glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids and thyroid hormones-many others were characterised, including those involved in xenobiotic recognition and responses. 1 In terms of toxicology, most important among the latter so-called 'xenosensors' are the arylhydrocarbon receptor (AHR), the pregnane X receptor and the constitutive androstane receptor. [...]a whole range of different adverse effects can be anticipated; many of them address multiple hormone-sensitive systems simultaneously. 5 For example, the earlier onset of female puberty, increased sensitivity of adipose tissue towards insulin, obesity, and neuronal developmental damage had previously been linked to various EDC; these effects urgently require further clarification.\n 12 Apoptotic resistance It is well known from chemotherapy that exposure to genotoxic drugs can induce resistance towards apoptosis in the cells treated.
Bibliography:PMID:20870657
local:jech;65/1/1
istex:52B1732E82FAA425BBE9699B3F0CECB2745F680C
ArticleID:jech83881
href:jech-65-1.pdf
ark:/67375/NVC-F0QD2LX2-T
SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Editorial-2
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:0143-005X
1470-2738
DOI:10.1136/jech.2008.083881