Poor overall quality of clinical practice guidelines for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review

• Published in: British journal of sports medicine Vol. 52; no. 5; pp. 337 - 343
• Main Authors: Lin, Ivan, Wiles, Louise K, Waller, Robert, Goucke, Roger, Nagree, Yusuf, Gibberd, Michael, Straker, Leon, Maher, Christopher G, O’Sullivan, Peter P B
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.03.2018
• Subjects: Arthritis; Back pain; Clinical medicine; Clinical practice guidelines; Family physicians; Health care; Knee; Medical research; Medicine; Patients; Primary care; Quality; Studies; Systematic review; United States > US; effectiveness; knowledge translation; evidence based
• ISSN: 0306-3674; 1473-0480
• DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098375

ObjectivesUndertake a systematic critical appraisal of contemporary clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for common musculoskeletal (MSK) pain conditions: spinal (lumbar, thoracic and cervical), hip/knee (including osteoarthritis) and shoulder.DesignSystematic review of CPGs (PROSPERO number: CRD42016051653).Included CPGs were written in English, developed within the last 5 years, focused on adults and described development processes. Excluded CPGs were for: traumatic MSK pain, single modalities (eg, surgery), traditional healing/medicine, specific disease processes (eg, inflammatory arthropathies) or those that required payment.Data sources and method of appraisalFour scientific databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Physiotherapy Evidence Database) and four guideline repositories. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was used for critical appraisal.Results4664 records were identified, and 34 CPGs were included. Most were for osteoarthritis (n=12) or low back pain (n=11), most commonly from the USA (n=12). The mean overall AGREE II score was 45% (SD=19.7). Lowest mean domain scores were for applicability (26%, SD=19.5) and editorial independence (33%, SD=27.5). The highest score was for scope and purpose (72%, SD=14.3). Only 8 of 34 CPGS were high quality: for osteoarthritis (n=4), low back pain (n=2), neck (n=1) and shoulder pain (n=1).