Exploring the minimal important difference in the treatment of paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Study selection and analysis We used individual participant data from short-term double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) that were submitted to the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB). Table 1 Patient characteristics at baseline Pla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ mental health Vol. 27; no. 1; p. e300999
Main Authors Cohen, Sem E, Denys, Damiaan A J P, Mattila, Taina Kristiina, Storosum, Bram W C, de Boer, Anthonius, Zantvoord, Jasper Brian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, Royal College of Psychiatrists and British Psychological Society 19.06.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Study selection and analysis We used individual participant data from short-term double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) that were submitted to the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB). Table 1 Patient characteristics at baseline Placebo Active treatment P value N 146 147 N gender F (%) N gender M (%) 69 (47) 77 (53) 68 (46) 79 (54) 0.9 Mean age (SD) 12.6 (2.7) 12.7 (3.0) 0.78 Mean CYBOCS (SD) 23.4 (5.6) 24.0 (4.6) 0.37 Mean CGI-S (SD) 4.6 (0.79) 4.7 (0.73) 0.31 Severity categories N mild (%) N moderate (%) N severe (%) 111 (38) 145 (49) 37 (13) P value after t-test (age, CYBOCS, CGI-S) or χ 2-test (gender) . In a recent meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of SSRIs compared with placebo in paediatric OCD, a small standardised mean difference was demonstrated, yet mean CYBOCS differences were not reported which impedes interpretability.6 For assessing clinical relevance, it would be valuable to determine whether the placebo-active treatment separation equals the MID in youth with OCD. [...]because we were unable to use patient-reported outcome measures, and because the CGI-I focusses on illness-specific symptoms, our MID is assessor-based and does not incorporate non-illness-specific factors such as quality of life.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Correspondence-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2755-9734
2755-9734
DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2024-300999