Trends in colorectal cancer surgical resection rates during the screening era: a retrospective study in Italy

BackgroundFaecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening is effective in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but its sensitivity for proximal lesions remains low.ObjectivesWe compared age-adjusted CRC surgical resection rates across anatomic sites (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), ag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ open gastroenterology Vol. 11; no. 1; p. e001434
Main Authors Zorzi, Manuel, Calciano, Lucia, Gennaro, Nicola, Memo, Laura, Rizzato, Silvia, Stocco, Carmen, Urso, Emanuele D L, Negro, Silvia, Spolverato, Gaya, Pucciarelli, Salvatore, Sbaraglia, Marta, Guzzinati, Stefano
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 05.08.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundFaecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening is effective in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, but its sensitivity for proximal lesions remains low.ObjectivesWe compared age-adjusted CRC surgical resection rates across anatomic sites (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), age groups and sex over 20 years in a large Italian population. We particularly focused on changes in trends following FIT-screening implementation in the target population (50–69 years).DesignThis retrospective study analysed data from the Veneto Region’s administrative Hospital Discharge Dataset, involving over 54 000 patients aged 40–89 (43.4% female) who underwent CRC surgery between 2002 and 2021.ResultsOverall, surgery rates increased until 2007 (annual percentage changes: 2.5% in males, 2.9% in females) and then declined (−4.2% in males, −3.4% in females). This decline was steeper for distal and rectal cancers compared with proximal cancer, suggesting a shift towards more right-sided CRC surgery.In males, the prescreening increase in proximal surgery was reversed after screening implementation (slope change: −6%) while the prescreening decline accelerated for distal (−4%) and rectal (−3%) surgeries. In females, stable prescreening trends shifted downward for all sites (−5% for proximal, −8% for distal and −7% for rectal surgery). However, the change in trends between prescreening and postscreening periods was not different across anatomic sites for either sex (all slope change differences in pairwise comparisons were not statistically significant).ConclusionThe shift towards proximal surgery may not be entirely due to the FIT’s low sensitivity but may reflect an underlying upward trend in proximal cancers independent of screening.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Additional supplemental material is published online only. To view, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001434).
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
None declared.
ISSN:2054-4774
2054-4774
DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001434