Testosterone substitution with a new transdermal, hydroalcoholic gel applied to scrotal or non-scrotal skin: a multicentre trial

Objective: Testosterone-containing gels have improved testosterone substitution therapy, but they are associated with the risk of interpersonal transfer. Therefore, we tested a new hydroalcoholic 2.5% testosterone gel (TGW), which was removed by washing 10 min after administration. Design: The gel w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of endocrinology Vol. 153; no. 2; pp. 317 - 326
Main Authors Kühnert, B, Byrne, M, Simoni, M, Köpcke, W, Gerss, J, Lemmnitz, G, Nieschlag, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Colchester European Society of Endocrinology 01.08.2005
Portland Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Testosterone-containing gels have improved testosterone substitution therapy, but they are associated with the risk of interpersonal transfer. Therefore, we tested a new hydroalcoholic 2.5% testosterone gel (TGW), which was removed by washing 10 min after administration. Design: The gel was applied to scrotal or non-scrotal skin in comparison to two 2.5 mg Androderm® patches in a randomised, three-arm, parallel-group, controlled multicentre trial over a period of 24 weeks. We included symptomatic hypogonadal men whose morning testosterone levels were <10 nmol/l. Either 1 g TGW was applied to scrotal skin (n = 54) or 5 g to non-scrotal skin (n = 56) once daily; the patch group (n = 52) applied two patches/day. Dose titration was allowed. Results: Whereas serum testosterone levels and the pre-post changes of the areas under the curve of testosterone and free testosterone between weeks 0 and 24 indicated equivalent treatment success for the patch and scrotal groups, the dermal gel group was significantly superior to the other two groups. Questionnaires on sexual function, mood and quality of life did not differ significantly between study groups, nor were prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and prostate symptoms different. However, tolerability was much better in the gel groups than the patch group. Conclusion: Efficacy, safety and tolerability suggest TGW as a favourable treatment for hypogonadal patients.
ISSN:0804-4643
1479-683X
DOI:10.1530/eje.1.01964