FDG-PET for Prediction of AD Dementia in Mild Cognitive Impairment. A Review of the State of the Art with Particular Emphasis on the Comparison with Other Neuroimaging Modalities (MRI and Perfusion SPECT)

• Published in: Current Alzheimer research Vol. 14; no. 2; p. 127
• Main Authors: Sanchez-Catasus, Carlos A, Stormezand, Gilles N, van Laar, Peter Jan, De Deyn, Peter P, Sanchez, Mario Alvarez, Dierckx, Rudi A J O
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United Arab Emirates 01.02.2017
• Subjects: Alzheimer Disease - diagnostic imaging; Cognitive Dysfunction - diagnostic imaging; Disease Progression; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neuroimaging; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
• ISSN: 1875-5828
• DOI: 10.2174/1567205013666160629081956

This review article aims at providing a state-of-the-art review of the role of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (FDG-PET) in the prediction of Alzheimer's dementia in subjects suffering mild cognitive impairment (MCI), with a particular focus on the predictive power of FDG-PET compared to structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI). We also address perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as a less costly and more accessible alternative to FDG-PET. A search in PubMed was performed, taking into consideration relevant scientific articles published in English within the last five years and limited to human studies. This recent literature confirms the effectiveness of FDG-PET and sMRI for prediction of AD dementia in MCI. However, there are discordant results regarding which image modality is superior. This could be explained by the high variability of metrics used to evaluate both imaging modalities and/or by sampling/population issues such as age, disease severity and conversion time. FDG-PET seems to outperform sMRI in rapidly converting early-onset MCI individuals, whereas sMRI may outperform FDG-PET in late-onset MCI subjects, in which case FDG PET might only provide a complementary role. Although FDG-PET performs better than perfusion SPECT, current evidence confirms perfusion SPECT as a valid alternative when FDG- PET is not available. Finally, possible future directions in the field are discussed.