Multicentre, prospective, randomised study comparing the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in a screening population (the TOPAZ study)

• Published in: Gut Vol. 70; no. 11; pp. 2115 - 2122
• Main Authors: Cash, Brooks D, Fleisher, Mark R, Fern, Steven, Rajan, Elizabeth, Haithcock, Robyn, Kastenberg, David M, Pound, David, Papageorgiou, Neofytos P, Fernández-Urién, Ignacio, Schmelkin, Ira J, Rex, Douglas K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology 01.11.2021; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Aged; Blood tests; Capsule Endoscopy; Colon; colonic adenomas; colonic polyps; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis; Colonography, Computed Tomographic; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; colorectal cancer screening; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis; endoscopic procedures; Endoscopy; FDA approval; Female; Humans; Male; Mass Screening; Medical screening; Middle Aged; Polyps; Population; Population studies; Prospective Studies; United States > US; Europe; endoscopic procedures; colorectal cancer screening; colonic adenomas; colonic polyps
• ISSN: 0017-5749; 1468-3288; 1468-3288
• DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322578

ObjectiveColon capsule endoscopy (CCE) has shown promise for colorectal neoplasia detection compared with optical colonoscopy (OC), but has not been compared with other screening tests in average risk screening patients.DesignPatients 50 to 75 years of age (African Americans, 45–75 years) were randomised to CCE or CT colonography (CTC) and subsequent blinded OC. The primary endpoint was diagnostic yield of polyps ≥6 mm with CCE or CTC. Secondary endpoints included accuracy for size and histology, examination completeness, number/proportion of subjects with polyps and adenomas ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm, subject satisfaction and safety.ResultsFrom 320 enrolled subjects, data from 286 (89.4%) were evaluable. The proportion of subjects with any polyp ≥6 mm confirmed by OC was 31.6% for CCE versus 8.6% for CTC (pPr non-inferiority and superiority=0.999). The diagnostic yield of polyps ≥10 mm was 13.5% with CCE versus 6.3% with CTC (pPr non-inferiority=0.9954). The sensitivity and specificity of CCE for polyps ≥6 mm was 79.2% and 96.3% while that of CTC was 26.8% and 98.9%. The sensitivity and specificity of CCE for polyps ≥10 mm was 85.7% and 98.2% compared with 50% and 99.1% for CTC. Both tests were well tolerated/safe.ConclusionCCE was superior to CTC for detection of polyps ≥6 mm and non-inferior for identification of polyps ≥10 mm. CCE should be considered comparable or superior to CTC as a colorectal neoplasia screening test, although neither test is as effective as OC.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02754661.