Personal utility is inherent to direct-to-consumer genomic testing

People for and against direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic tests are arguing around two issues: first, on whether an autonomy-based account can justify the tests; second, on whether the tests bring any personal utility. Bunnik et al, in an article published in this journal, were doubtful on the latter,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical ethics Vol. 42; no. 10; pp. 649 - 652
Main Authors Chung, Matthew Wai Heng, Ng, Joseph Chi Fung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Institute of Medical Ethics and BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.10.2016
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0306-6800
1473-4257
1473-4257
DOI10.1136/medethics-2015-103057

Cover

More Information
Summary:People for and against direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic tests are arguing around two issues: first, on whether an autonomy-based account can justify the tests; second, on whether the tests bring any personal utility. Bunnik et al, in an article published in this journal, were doubtful on the latter, especially in clinically irrelevant and uninterpretable sequences, and how far this claim could go in the justification. Here we argue that personal utility is inherent to DTC genomic tests and their results. We discuss Bunnik et al's account of personal utility and identify problems in its motivation and application. We then explore concepts like utility and entertainment which suggest that DTC genomic tests bring personal utility to their consumers, both in the motivation and the content of the tests. This points to an alternative account of personal utility which entails that entertainment value alone is adequate to justify DTC genomic tests, given appropriate strategies to communicate tests results with the consumers. It supports the autonomy-based justification of the test by showing that DTC genomic test itself stands as a valuable option and facilitates meaningful choice of the people.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-6800
1473-4257
1473-4257
DOI:10.1136/medethics-2015-103057