Clutch variation and egg rejection in three hosts of the pallid cuckoo, Cuculus pallidus

Abstract In theory, hosts of avian brood parasites would benefit by modifying their egg appearance in two ways to help identify mimetic foreign eggs: (i) by laying clutches that are more uniform in appearance and (ii) by laying clutches that differ from those of other females in the population. Supp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehaviour Vol. 147; no. 1; pp. 19 - 36
Main Authors Landstrom, Michelle, Heinsohn, Robert, Langmore, Naomi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Netherlands Brill 2010
BRILL
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract In theory, hosts of avian brood parasites would benefit by modifying their egg appearance in two ways to help identify mimetic foreign eggs: (i) by laying clutches that are more uniform in appearance and (ii) by laying clutches that differ from those of other females in the population. Support for these theories is inconsistent, and few studies have used objective measures of clutch variation. Here we used reflectance spectrophotometry to quantify within-clutch and between-clutch variation of three host species of an Australian brood parasite, the pallid cuckoo (Cuculus pallidus). We used egg-swapping experiments in which subjects were presented with either a conspecific egg or a heterospecific egg to compare the egg rejection responses of a frequently parasitised host, the white-plumed honeyeater (Lichenostomus penicillatus), with two less frequently parasitised hosts, dusky woodswallows (Artamus cyanopterus) and willie wagtails (Rhipidura leucophrys). As predicted, rejection rate increased as contrast between foreign egg and host clutch increased. Further, the major host showed greater between-clutch variation than the occasional hosts, and also rejected more similar-looking eggs. Contrary to predictions however, within-clutch variation was not lower in the major host, nor was it important in predicting the rejection rate of foreign eggs by the three host species.
Bibliography:href:1568539x_147_01_s002_text.pdf
istex:EDB0C606EE30B16A3F1DA271F2FACDA93680ABEA
ark:/67375/JKT-FVX37HHL-Q
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0005-7959
1568-539X
DOI:10.1163/000579509X12483520922043