Genetic variation within endemic Podarcis lizards from the Balearic Islands inferred from partial Cytochrome b sequences

Abstract Sequences of the cytochrome b gene were analysed for 47 samples of two species of Podarcis from the Balearic Islands (P. pityusensis from Pityuses and P. lilfordi, from Gymnesies archipelago). The average uncorrected distance between the two species studied was 9.7%. The sampled individuals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmphibia-reptilia Vol. 25; no. 4; pp. 407 - 414
Main Authors Terrasa, B, Picornell, A, Castro, JA, Ramon, M M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Netherlands Brill 2004
BRILL
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Sequences of the cytochrome b gene were analysed for 47 samples of two species of Podarcis from the Balearic Islands (P. pityusensis from Pityuses and P. lilfordi, from Gymnesies archipelago). The average uncorrected distance between the two species studied was 9.7%. The sampled individuals from each species form reciprocally monophyletic units. Assuming an overall rate of change for cytochrome b of 2% per million years the nucleotide divergence of 9.7% ± 1.9% between P. lilfordi and P. pityusensis, could correspond to a divergence time of 4.95 ± 0.95 million years. The separation time between Gymnesies and Pityuses archipelagos according to geological hypotheses is around 5 million years, thus our results suggest the ancestors of the two present forms became isolated during this event. The most parsimonious networks suggest that currently accepted subspecies do not form monophyletic groups, and so should be reassessed. Despite our limited sampling the level of variability is much higher in P. lilfordi than P. pityusensis. Since they are sister taxa the relative age of each species is equal, therefore the differences might be due to historical population structure differences. However it seems that the forms on the islands are not genetically distinct units, implying that morphological differences are recent adaptations to their environments.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/JKT-BM0GW0SC-2
href:15685381_025_04_s005_text.pdf
istex:08991BEA645DAEB5CBAE349BBB9BB6D781357E73
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0173-5373
1568-5381
DOI:10.1163/1568538042788960