Subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography in patients with nanophthalmos

Purpose To compare subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) between patients with nanophthalmos and age-matched controls. Methods This prospective, cross-sectional and comparative study included 31 eyes from 31 patients with nanophthalmos (study group) and 31 eyes from 31 healthy subjects (control group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 98; no. 3; pp. 345 - 349
Main Authors Demircan, Ali, Altan, Cigdem, Osmanbasoglu, Ozen A, Celik, Ugur, Kara, Necip, Demirok, Ahmet
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.03.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303465

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To compare subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) between patients with nanophthalmos and age-matched controls. Methods This prospective, cross-sectional and comparative study included 31 eyes from 31 patients with nanophthalmos (study group) and 31 eyes from 31 healthy subjects (control group). SFCT and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. All participants underwent a standardised ocular examination including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and refractive error (RE) measurements. Results Mean SFCT in the nanophthalmic eyes and in the control eyes were 551.3±87 µm and 330.5±46 µm, respectively (p<0.001). Mean BCVA, RE, CMT, axial length (AL), ACD, CCT values were 0.4±0.28 logMAR Unit, +10.6 (3.06), 331.9±78 µm, 18.8±1.5 mm, 2.42±0.4 mm and 577.2±32 µm, respectively, in nanophthalmic eyes and there was a statistically significant difference between groups (p<0.001 for each). There were negative correlations between SFCT with AL (r=−0.836, p<0.001) and ACD (r=−0.597, p<0.001) for the entire study population. SFCT was significantly correlated with CCT (r=0.471, p<0.001) and CMT (r=0.585, p<0.001), RE (r=0.836, p<0.001). Conclusions SFCT was significantly higher in nanophthalmic eyes. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of SFCT to explain the pathophysiology of nanophthalmos.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303465