Building consensus for the future of paediatric simulation: a novel ‘KJ Reverse-Merlin’ methodology
ObjectivesThis project aims to identify guiding strategic principles to optimise simulation-based educational impact on learning, patient safety and child health.MethodsStudy participants included 39 simulation experts who used a novel ‘KJ Reverse-Merlin’ consensus process in the systematic identifi...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning Vol. 2; no. 2; pp. 35 - 41 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
01.06.2016
BMJ Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ObjectivesThis project aims to identify guiding strategic principles to optimise simulation-based educational impact on learning, patient safety and child health.MethodsStudy participants included 39 simulation experts who used a novel ‘KJ Reverse-Merlin’ consensus process in the systematic identification of barriers to success in simulation, grouped them in themes and subsequently identified solutions for each theme.Results193 unique factors were identified and clustered into 6 affinity groups. 6 key consensus strategies were identified: (1) allocate limited resources by engaging health systems partners to define education and research priorities; (2) conduct and publish rigorous translational and cost-effectiveness research; (3) foster collaborative multidisciplinary research and education networks; (4) design simulation solutions with systems integration and sustainability in mind; (5) leverage partnerships with industry for simulation, medical and educational technology; (6) advocate to engage the education community, research funding agencies and regulatory bodies.ConclusionsSimulation can be used as a research, quality improvement and or educational tool aimed at improving the quality of care provided to children. However, without organisation, strategy, prioritisation and collaboration, the simulation community runs the risk of wasting resources, duplicating and misdirecting the efforts. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2056-6697 2056-6697 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000072 |