Demographic variation in how the social brain processes news messages

A high capacity for visual perception distinguishes Homo sapiens from other primates. This human ability to detect social cues and retain visual records of social networks has been tested mostly with static facial images in laboratory settings. However, media consumption has become closely entangled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolitics and the life sciences Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 61 - 73
Main Authors van Driel, Irene Ingeborg, Grabe, Maria Elizabeth, Bas, Ozen, Kleemans, Mariska
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
French
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A high capacity for visual perception distinguishes Homo sapiens from other primates. This human ability to detect social cues and retain visual records of social networks has been tested mostly with static facial images in laboratory settings. However, media consumption has become closely entangled with the way social life is navigated. Therefore, the study reported here tested demographic differences (gender and education) in visual information processing of social and nonsocial objects featured in audiovisual news content. Women recognized (accuracy) and recalled (salience) social images better than men. On the other hand, men were more skilled at recognizing, but not recalling, nonsocial images. Participants with lower educational levels recognized and recalled fewer images than individuals with higher educational levels. Interactions between demographic variables and time suggest that memory records for social images are more stable than those for nonsocial images. Memory may have survival-relevant importance, serving navigational functions that vary across environmental demands, resulting in differences across demographic groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0730-9384
1471-5457
DOI:10.1017/pls.2016.3