Prognostic Significance of Location of the Primary Tumor in Operable Breast Cancers
Background: The prognostic significance of the primary tumor site in breast cancers is not established with only a few studies having evaluated the issue. Materials and Methods: The relevance of a primary tumor site with respect to systemic disease relapse was evaluated in 187 patients with breast c...
Saved in:
Published in | Indian journal of cancer Vol. 46; no. 2; p. 139 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
India
Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Cancer Society
01.04.2009
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: The prognostic significance of the primary tumor site in
breast cancers is not established with only a few studies having
evaluated the issue. Materials and Methods: The relevance of a primary
tumor site with respect to systemic disease relapse was evaluated in
187 patients with breast cancer treated with primary surgery and
adjuvant chemotherapy, in whom the location of primary tumor was
classifiable in any one of the three sites, namely: outer, periareolar,
and inner, quadrants. Data was obtained from prospectively maintained
records of breast cancer patients treated at a single surgical unit in
a tertiary care center. Results: The three groups were comparable with
regard to demographic, pathological tumor, and treatment
characteristics. In the multivariate analysis, patients with inner and
periareolar quadrant tumors had a higher hazard for systemic disease
relapse, (2.53, 95% CI: 1.18-5.42; P = 0.02, and 2.73, 95% CI:
1.04-7.14; P = 0.04, respectively) as compared to outer quadrant
tumors. The projected five-year survival estimates in Kaplan Meier were
87%, 61%, and 69%, respectively, for outer, periareolar, and inner
quadrant. On further substratification the difference was particularly
noted in high risk inner quadrant tumors: age ≤ 45, premenopausal
patients, tumor size> 2 cms, positive nodes and intermediate or high
grade histology, as also in patients treated with breast conservation
and CMF, Cyclophosphamide, Methorexate, 5 Fluorouracil chemotherapy.
Conclusion: The location of the primary tumor influences survival in
breast cancer with inferior outcome for tumors in inner and periareolar
quadrants, especially in high risk groups and those treated with
conservative approaches. The role of aggressive therapies merits
investigation in these patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0019-509X 1998-4774 |
DOI: | 10.4103/0019-509X.49152 |