Approaching autonomous driving with cautious optimism: analysis of road traffic injuries involving autonomous vehicles based on field test data

• Published in: Injury prevention Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 42 - 47
• Main Authors: Ye, Wanbao, Wang, Chuanlin, Chen, Fuxiang, Yan, Shuzhen, Li, Liping
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.02.2021
• Subjects: Automation; Autonomous vehicles; Fatalities; Injuries; Legislation; Lighting; Motor vehicles; Public health; Roads; Roads & highways; Traffic; Traffic accidents & safety; Variables; motor vehicle occupant; engineering; public health; social marketing
• ISSN: 1353-8047; 1475-5785
• DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043402

ObjectivesTo examine the patterns and associated factors of road traffic injuries (RTIs) involving autonomous vehicles (AVs) and to discuss the public health implications and challenges of autonomous driving.MethodsData were extracted from the reports of traffic crashes involving AVs. All the reports were submitted to the California Department of Motor Vehicles by manufacturers with permission to operate AV test on public roads. Descriptive analysis and χ2 analysis or Fisher’s exact test was conducted to describe the injury patterns and to examine the influencing factors of injury outcomes, respectively. Binary logistic regression using the Wald test was employed to calculate the OR, adjusted OR (AOR) and 95% CIs. A two-tailed probability (p<0.05) was adopted to indicate statistical significance.Results133 reports documented 24 individuals injured in 19 crashes involving AVs, with the overestimated incidence rate of 18.05 per 100 crashes. 70.83% of the injured were AV occupants, replacing vulnerable road users as the leading victims. Head and neck were the most commonly injured locations. Driving in poor lighting was at greater risk of RTIs (AOR 6.37, 95% CI 1.47 to 27.54). Collisions with vulnerable road users or incidents happening during commute periods led to a greater number of victims (p<0.05). Autonomous mode cannot perform better than conventional mode in road traffic safety to date (p=0.468).ConclusionsPoor lighting improvement and the regulation of commute-period traffic and vulnerable road users should be strengthened for AV-related road safety. So far AVs have not demonstrated the potential to dramatically reduce RTIs. Cautious optimism about AVs is more advisable, and multifaceted efforts, including legislation, smarter roads, and knowledge dissemination campaigns, are fairly required to accelerate the development and acceptance.