UK Palliative trainees Research Collaborative (UK-PRC): the first 5 years – 0–100 study sites

• Published in: BMJ supportive & palliative care p. bmjspcare-2022-003635
• Main Authors: Wakefield, Donna, Etkind, Simon Noah, Bemand-Qureshi, Lucy, Sutherland, Anna, Koffman, Jonathan, Dewhurst, Felicity, Noble, Simon, Chamberlain, Charlotte
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 22.04.2022; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Audits; Cancer; Collaboration; Education and training; End of life care; Features; Funding; Hospice care; Medical education; Medical research; Medicine; Oncology; Palliative care; Participation; Patients; Physicians; Quality improvement; United Kingdom > UK; End of life care; Education and training; Hospice care; Cancer
• ISSN: 2045-435X; 2045-4368
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003635

ObjectivesPalliative care research suffers from underfunding and a workforce spread across multiple settings leading to a lack of large-scale studies. To facilitate multisite research and audit we set up the UK Palliative trainees Research Collaborative (UKPRC), the first national trainee-led audit and research collaborative in palliative care. Here, we critically review the progress and potential of the UKPRC since its inception in 2016, identifying key challenges and facilitators. Members of the UKPRC steering committee collaborated to write this reflection, reviewing existing evidence regarding trainee-led research collaboratives.FindingsThe UKPRC has representation from 16/19 UK training regions. Projects are run by a core team; local collaborators collect data at each site. The collaborative is supported by academic leads and newly qualified consultants to develop a culture of continuous improvement in practice. We have conducted four national projects to date, including an audit covering 119 sites. Facilitators for our work include a focus on inclusivity and national representation; support from recently qualified consultants to ensure continuity; and taking a pragmatic approach, focusing initially on straightforward projects to build momentum. Challenges include the step from national audit to multisite, patient-facing research and maintaining continuity in a membership with high turnover.ConclusionsThere is potential to change practice through large scale data collection via the trainee-led collaborative model. Collaboration is especially important in a small specialty with limited resources. The UKPRC has demonstrated ‘proof of concept’ and has the potential to support and sustain a culture where research can flourish within palliative care.