Perceptual Upright: The Relative Effectiveness of Dynamic and Static Images Under Different Gravity States

The perceived direction of up depends on both gravity and visual cues to orientation. Static visual cues to orientation have been shown to be less effective in influencing the perception of upright (PU) under microgravity conditions than they are on earth (Dyde et al., 2009). Here we introduce dynam...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSeeing and perceiving Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 53 - 64
Main Authors Jenkin, Michael, Zacher, James, Dyde, Richard, Harris, Laurence, Jenkin, Heather
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Netherlands BRILL 2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The perceived direction of up depends on both gravity and visual cues to orientation. Static visual cues to orientation have been shown to be less effective in influencing the perception of upright (PU) under microgravity conditions than they are on earth (Dyde et al., 2009). Here we introduce dynamic orientation cues into the visual background to ascertain whether they might increase the effectiveness of visual cues in defining the PU under different gravity conditions. Brief periods of microgravity and hypergravity were created using parabolic flight. Observers viewed a polarized, natural scene presented at various orientations on a laptop viewed through a hood which occluded all other visual cues. The visual background was either an animated video clip in which actors moved along the visual ground plane or an individual static frame taken from the same clip. We measured the perceptual upright using the oriented character recognition test (OCHART). Dynamic visual cues significantly enhance the effectiveness of vision in determining the perceptual upright under normal gravity conditions. Strong trends were found for dynamic visual cues to produce an increase in the visual effect under both microgravity and hypergravity conditions.
Bibliography:href:18784763_024_01_s004_text.pdf
ark:/67375/JKT-J2GX8F4J-F
istex:EFEA3765ECCB4A391F4EA8148B68AF7194A40C7A
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1878-4755
1878-4763
1878-4755
DOI:10.1163/187847511X555292