An Analysis of the Algebraic Group Model

The algebraic group model (AGM), formalized by Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss, has recently received significant attention. One of the appealing properties of the AGM is that it is viewed as being (strictly) weaker than the generic group model (GGM), in the sense that hardness results for algebraic alg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvances in Cryptology - ASIACRYPT 2022 Vol. 13794; pp. 310 - 322
Main Authors Zhang, Cong, Zhou, Hong-Sheng, Katz, Jonathan
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Springer 2023
Springer Nature Switzerland
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The algebraic group model (AGM), formalized by Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss, has recently received significant attention. One of the appealing properties of the AGM is that it is viewed as being (strictly) weaker than the generic group model (GGM), in the sense that hardness results for algebraic algorithms imply hardness results for generic algorithms, and generic reductions in the AGM (namely, between the algebraic formulations of two problems) imply generic reductions in the GGM. We highlight that as the GGM and AGM are currently formalized, this is not true: hardness in the AGM may not imply hardness in the GGM, and a generic reduction in the AGM may not imply a similar reduction in the GGM.
Bibliography:The authorship order is randomized, and all authors contributed equally.C. Zhang—Work supported in part by Zhejiang University Education Foundation Qizhen Scholar Foundation. Portions of this work were done while at the University of Maryland.H.-S. Zhou—Work supported in part by NSF grant CNS-1801470, a Google Faculty Research Award, and a research gift from Ergo Platform.
ISBN:3031229711
9783031229718
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-22972-5_11