An Analysis of the Algebraic Group Model
The algebraic group model (AGM), formalized by Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss, has recently received significant attention. One of the appealing properties of the AGM is that it is viewed as being (strictly) weaker than the generic group model (GGM), in the sense that hardness results for algebraic alg...
Saved in:
Published in | Advances in Cryptology - ASIACRYPT 2022 Vol. 13794; pp. 310 - 322 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Book Chapter |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Springer
2023
Springer Nature Switzerland |
Series | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The algebraic group model (AGM), formalized by Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss, has recently received significant attention. One of the appealing properties of the AGM is that it is viewed as being (strictly) weaker than the generic group model (GGM), in the sense that hardness results for algebraic algorithms imply hardness results for generic algorithms, and generic reductions in the AGM (namely, between the algebraic formulations of two problems) imply generic reductions in the GGM. We highlight that as the GGM and AGM are currently formalized, this is not true: hardness in the AGM may not imply hardness in the GGM, and a generic reduction in the AGM may not imply a similar reduction in the GGM. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | The authorship order is randomized, and all authors contributed equally.C. Zhang—Work supported in part by Zhejiang University Education Foundation Qizhen Scholar Foundation. Portions of this work were done while at the University of Maryland.H.-S. Zhou—Work supported in part by NSF grant CNS-1801470, a Google Faculty Research Award, and a research gift from Ergo Platform. |
ISBN: | 3031229711 9783031229718 |
ISSN: | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-031-22972-5_11 |