Impact of time of culture specimen collection on the recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae after a positive nucleic acid amplification test

ObjectivesCulture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae remains essential for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. We evaluated the effect of time of specimen collection on culture yield following a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT).MethodsWe retrospectively assessed N. gonorrhoeae culture...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSexually transmitted infections Vol. 99; no. 8; pp. 520 - 526
Main Authors Nadal-Barón, Patricia, Trejo-Zahinos, Jesús, García, Jorge Nestor, Salmerón, Paula, Sulleiro, Elena, Arando, Maider, Descalzo, Vicente, Álvarez-Lopez, Patricia, El Ouazzani, Rachid, López, Luis, Zarzuela, Francesc, Ruiz, Edurne, Llinas, Montserrat, Blanco-Grau, Albert, Curran, Adrian, Larrosa, María Nieves, Pumarola, Tomàs, Hoyos-Mallecot, Yannick
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.12.2023
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectivesCulture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae remains essential for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. We evaluated the effect of time of specimen collection on culture yield following a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT).MethodsWe retrospectively assessed N. gonorrhoeae culture yield among asymptomatic individuals (largely men who have sex with men) who attended for sexual health screening and had a positive NAAT. Participants underwent either same-day testing and notification (Drassanes Exprés) or standard screening with deferred testing.ResultsAmong 10 423 screened individuals, 809 (7.7%) tested positive for N. gonorrhoeae. A total of 995 different anatomical sites of infection culture was performed in 583 of 995 (58.6%) of anatomical sites (Drassanes Exprés 278 of 347, 80.1%; standard screening 305 of 648, 47.1%; p<0.001). Recovery was highest when culture specimens were collected within 3–7 days of screening with only a slight drop in recovery when the interval extended to 7 days . Recovery from pharynx was 38 of 149 (25.5%) within 3 days, 19 of 81 (23.4%) after 4–7 days (p=0.7245), 11 of 102 (10.7%) after 8–14 days (p<0.0036) and 1 of 22 (4.5%) with longer delays (p=0.00287). Recovery from rectum was 49 of 75 (65.3%) within 3 days, 28 of 45 (62.2%) after 4–7 days (p=0.7318), 41 of 69 (59.4%) after 8–14 days (p=0.4651) and 6 of 18 (33.3%) with longer delays (p=0.0131). Median culture specimen collection time was 1 day within Drassanes Exprés vs 8 days within standard screening. Consequently, the overall culture yield was slightly higher within Drassanes Exprés (102/278, 36.6% vs 99/305, 32.5%; p=0.2934).ConclusionReducing the interval between screening and collection of culture specimens increased N. gonorrhoeae recovery in extragenital samples. Implementing a same-day testing and notification programme increased collection of culture samples and culture yield in our setting, which may help AMR surveillance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1368-4973
1472-3263
DOI:10.1136/sextrans-2023-055899