The future of NHS primary care should focus on integration not fragmentation
The aim is to allow general practitioners (GPs) to primarily focus on the latter group of patients.12 While this approach appears superficially to be a rational solution to manage escalating workload in general practice by diverting some patients to be managed elsewhere, it also raises substantial c...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ (Online) Vol. 385; p. q1087 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
14.05.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The aim is to allow general practitioners (GPs) to primarily focus on the latter group of patients.12 While this approach appears superficially to be a rational solution to manage escalating workload in general practice by diverting some patients to be managed elsewhere, it also raises substantial concerns about the potential unintended effects. Beyond the clinical implications, separating primary care services could affect NHS efficiency and costs.5 Duplication of services and higher administrative overheads will increase healthcare expenses without improving patient outcomes or clinician productivity.6 The split of services may also result in confusion, especially for those in vulnerable groups like older people or non-native English speakers who already struggle with navigating the existing healthcare system. Through recruiting multidisciplinary team members such as district nurses, therapists, social workers, pharmacists, care-coordinators and social prescribers to work as part of a comprehensive primary care team, we can provide a more coordinated approach to tackle a full spectrum of health issues.9 This model fosters stronger patient-provider relationships, improves patient satisfaction and empowerment, and is more cost-effective than the fragmented services currently being implemented in parts of England. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-4 content type line 23 ObjectType-Editorial-2 ObjectType-Commentary-1 ObjectType-Article-3 |
ISSN: | 1756-1833 1756-1833 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmj.q1087 |