INHIBITION OF OVULATION IN THE RAT BY INTRAHYPOTHALAMIC IMPLANTS OF AN ANTIOESTROGEN

• Published in: Journal of endocrinology Vol. 56; no. 3; pp. 585 - 590
• Main Authors: Billard, R, McDonald, P G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioScientifica 01.03.1973
• Subjects: Alkenes - pharmacology; Animals; Diencephalon - physiology; Dimethylamines - pharmacology; Estradiol - physiology; Estrogen Antagonists; Estrus; Feedback; Female; Hypothalamus - drug effects; Hypothalamus - physiology; Life Sciences; Methylamines - pharmacology; Ovulation - drug effects; Pituitary Gland - physiology; Pregnancy; Rats; Stilbenes - pharmacology; intrahypothalamic implant; pituitary; rat; petit mammifère; profoliol; oestradiol; ovulation; estradiol
• ISSN: 0022-0795; 1479-6805
• DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0560585

In order to determine the sites at which oestradiol exerts its positive feed back effect, double-walled cannulae containing the antioestrogen ICI 46,474 were implanted into the preoptic area, median eminence or anterior pituitary. Implants were made at different stages of the cycle and left in place for between 4 and 96 h. Implants in the preoptic area for 24, 48 or 96 h did not significantly inhibit ovulation. Implants placed in the median eminence for 24 h before the critical period significantly inhibited ovulation when compared with controls (P < 0·02). Implantation of antioestrogen in the anterior pituitary for a similar 24-h period was ineffective in blocking ovulation. However, when mixed with cocoa butter and implanted in the anterior pituitary the antioestrogen significantly inhibited ovulation (P < 0·02). The results show that by preventing the action of oestradiol on either the pituitary or the median eminence, ovulation may be inhibited. Ovulation was not affected by implants in the preoptic region which suggests that this area is not involved in the positive feedback action of oestradiol.