Bariatric surgery and justice in an imperfect world

The Court of Appeal did not, as some headlines suggest, make a moral judgment on the merits of Tom Condliff’s case

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ Vol. 343; no. aug02 2; p. d4944
Main Author Sokol, Daniel K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 02.08.2011
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Beckett, Samuel (1906-1989)
Body Mass Index
Clinical decision making
Decision making
England
Families & family life
Funding
Gastrointestinal surgery
Gastroplasty - ethics
Gastroplasty - legislation & jurisprudence
Health Policy
Human rights
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Morality
Morals
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Patients
Primary care
Primary Health Care - ethics
Primary Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence
Surgery
England
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The Court of Appeal did not, as some headlines suggest, make a moral judgment on the merits of Tom Condliff’s case
Bibliography:ArticleID:sokolaug
href:bmj-343-bmj-d4944.pdf
ark:/67375/NVC-XBCW1PF9-T
istex:BFE1429EA763C758055A1387C931B2CF1B1383CC
local:bmj;343/aug02_2/d4944
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0959-8138
1468-5833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.d4944