In vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics and methane production differ in selected key pasture species in Australia

Thirteen current and potential pasture species in southern Australia were examined for differences in their nutritive values and in vitro rumen fermentation profiles, including methane production by rumen microbes, to assist in selection of pasture species for mitigation of methane emission from rum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrop and pasture science Vol. 64; no. 9; pp. 935 - 942
Main Authors Banik, B. K, Durmic, Z, Erskine, W, Ghamkhar, K, Revell, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published CSIRO Publishing 01.01.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Thirteen current and potential pasture species in southern Australia were examined for differences in their nutritive values and in vitro rumen fermentation profiles, including methane production by rumen microbes, to assist in selection of pasture species for mitigation of methane emission from ruminant livestock. Plants were grown in a glasshouse and harvested at 7 and 11 weeks after sowing for in vitro batch fermentation, with nutritive values assessed at 11 weeks of growth. The pasture species tested differed significantly (P < 0.001) in methane production during in vitro rumen fermentation, with the lowest methane-producing species, Biserrula pelecinus L., producing 90% less methane (4 mL CH4 g–1 dry matter incubated) than the highest methane-producing species, Trifolium spumosum L. (51 mL CH4 g–1 dry matter incubated). Proxy nutritive values of species were found not to be useful predictors of plant fermentation characteristics or methane production. In conclusion, there were significant differences in fermentative traits, including methane production, among selected pasture species in Australia, indicating that the choice of fodder species may offer a way to reduce the impact on the environment from enteric fermentation.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CP13149
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1836-0947
1836-5795
DOI:10.1071/CP13149