Implications of the 2022 lung function update and GLI global reference equations among patients with interstitial lung disease

BackgroundLung function testing remains a cornerstone in the assessment and management of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The clinical implications of the Global Lung function Initiative (GLI) reference equations and the updated interpretation strategies remain uncertain.MethodsAdult patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThorax Vol. 79; no. 11; pp. 1024 - 1032
Main Authors Li, Andrew, Teoh, Alan, Troy, Lauren, Glaspole, Ian, Wilsher, Margaret L, de Boer, Sally, Wrobel, Jeremy, Moodley, Yuben P, Thien, Francis, Gallagher, Henry, Galbraith, Michelle, Chambers, Daniel C, Mackintosh, John, Goh, Nicole, Khor, Yet Hong, Edwards, Adrienne, Royals, Karen, Grainge, Christopher, Kwan, Benjamin, Keir, Gregory J, Ong, Chong, Reynolds, Paul N, Veitch, Elizabeth, Chai, Gin Tsen, Ng, Ziqin, Tan, Geak Poh, Jackson, Dan, Corte, Tamera, Jo, Helen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society 24.09.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundLung function testing remains a cornerstone in the assessment and management of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The clinical implications of the Global Lung function Initiative (GLI) reference equations and the updated interpretation strategies remain uncertain.MethodsAdult patients with ILD with baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) were included from the Australasian ILD registry and the National Healthcare Group ILD registry, Singapore.The European Coal and Steel Community and Miller reference equations were compared with the GLI reference equations to assess (a) differences in lung function percent predicted values; (b) ILD risk prediction models and (c) eligibility for ILD clinical trial enrolment.ResultsAmong 2219 patients with ILD, 1712 (77.2%) were white individuals. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), connective tissue disease-associated ILD and unclassifiable ILD predominated.Median FVC was 2.60 (2.01–3.36) L, forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 2.09 (1.67–2.66) L and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 13.60 (10.16–17.60) mL/min/mm Hg. When applying the GLI reference equations, the mean FVC percentage predicted was 8.8% lower (87.7% vs 78.9%, p<0.01) while the mean DLCO percentage predicted was 4.9% higher (58.5% vs 63.4%, p<0.01). There was a decrease in 19 IPF and 119 non-IPF patients who qualified for the nintedanib clinical trials when the GLI reference equations were applied. Risk prediction models performed similarly in predicting mortality using both reference equations.ConclusionApplying the GLI reference equations in patients with ILD leads to higher DLCO percentage predicted values and smaller lung volume percentage predicted values. While applying the GLI reference equations did not impact on prognostication, fewer patients met the clinical trial criteria for antifibrotic agents.
Bibliography:Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
TC and HJ are joint senior authors.
Supplemental material: Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
Additional supplemental material is published online only. To view, please visit the journal online (https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-221813).
None declared.
ISSN:0040-6376
1468-3296
1468-3296
DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-221813