Chronic environmental exposure to lead affects semen quality in a Mexican men population

Background: Male infertility is affected by several factors. Lead is one of the heavy metals more bioavailable than usually modifies the sperm quality in humans. Objective: The aim of this study was to establish the role of lead in semen quality in environmentally exposed men. Materials and Methods:...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIranian journal of reproductive medicine Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 267 - 274
Main Authors Morán-Martínez, Javier, Carranza-Rosales, Pilar, Morales-Vallarta, Mario, Heredia-Rojas, José A, Bassol-Mayagoitia, Susana, Betancourt-Martínez, Nadia Denys, Cerda-Flores, Ricardo M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Iran Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences of Yazd 01.04.2013
Research and Clinical Center for Infertility
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Male infertility is affected by several factors. Lead is one of the heavy metals more bioavailable than usually modifies the sperm quality in humans. Objective: The aim of this study was to establish the role of lead in semen quality in environmentally exposed men. Materials and Methods: Semen and blood samples were obtained from two groups: the exposed group (EG=20) and the non-exposed group (NEG=27). Two semen aliquots were used, one to evaluate spermatic quality and the other for lead determination. Blood (PbB) and semen lead (PbS) determination was performed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Results: The PbB concentration was significantly greater in the EG, 10.10±0.97 μgdL-1 than in the NEG, 6.42±0.38 μgdL-1 (p<0.01), as well as the PbS concentration, with 3.28±0.35 and 1.76±0.14μgdL-1 in the EG and NEG respectively (p=0.043). A significant correlation between PbS and PbB concentration in the EG was found (r=0.573, p=0.038). Overall, the spermatic quality was lower in the EG than in the NEG. Specifically, there were significant differences in the spermatic concentration [EG=43.98±6.26 and NEG=68.78±8.51X106 cellmL-1 (p<0.01)], motility [EG=49±7 and NEG=67±4% (p=0.029)], viability [EG=36.32±3.59 and NEG=72.12±1.91% (p<0.01)] and abnormal morphology [EG=67±18 and NEG=32±12% (p<0.01)]. In the immature germ cells (IGC) concentration differences were found only for A cells (EG=8.1±1.1x100 and NEG=3.2±1.9X100 spermatozoa) (p<0.01) and for Sab cells (EG=3.4±2.2x100 and NEG=1.1±1.0X100 spermatozoa) (p=0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that chronic environmental exposure to low levels of lead adversely affect the spermatic quality.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1680-6433
2008-2177