Live and let die

The case of Kerrie Wooltorton rests solely on whether or not her decision to refuse lifesaving treatment was legally competent

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ Vol. 339; no. oct07 1; p. b4112
Main Author McLean, Sheila A M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 07.10.2009
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Advance directives
Advance Directives - legislation & jurisprudence
Ethylene Glycol - poisoning
Female
Hospitals
Humans
Personality disorders
Physicians
Right to die
Treatment Refusal - legislation & jurisprudence
United Kingdom
Ventilators
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The case of Kerrie Wooltorton rests solely on whether or not her decision to refuse lifesaving treatment was legally competent
Bibliography:Related-article-href:10.1136/bmj.b4070
ark:/67375/NVC-3TJ38VWR-D
PMID:19812136
istex:179103D1B93166A168217D42781BE6AA9143E596
ArticleID:mcleanoct10
local:bmj;339/oct07_1/b4112
href:bmj-339-bmj-b4112.pdf
ISSN:0959-8138
1468-5833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.b4112