Optimizing weed control using dicamba and glufosinate in eligible crop systems

• Published in: Weed technology Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 468 - 480
• Main Authors: Priess, Grant L., Popp, Michael P., Norsworthy, Jason K., Mauromoustakos, Andy, Roberts, Trenton L., Butts, Thomas R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.08.2022
• Subjects: agricultural pesticides; Amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri; Best management practices; Biotypes; Cotton; Economic analysis; economics; Experiments; Glufosinate; Herbicides; Intervals; Loam soils; Monte Carlo simulation; Optimization; production agriculture; Seed banks; Seeds; Soybeans; Weed control; weed management; Weeds; United States > US
• ISSN: 0890-037X; 1550-2740
• DOI: 10.1017/wet.2022.44

A field experiment was conducted in 2019 and 2020 that included six site-years and four locations in Arkansas to determine the optimal sequence and timing of dicamba and glufosinate applications when applied alone, sequentially, or in combination to control Palmer amaranth by size: labeled (<10 cm height) and non-labeled (13 to 25 cm height). Single applications of dicamba, glufosinate, and dicamba plus glufosinate (not labeled) resulted in less than 80% Palmer amaranth control, regardless of weed size. The mixture of dicamba plus glufosinate was antagonistic for Palmer amaranth control and percent mortality. Sequential applications, averaged over all time intervals and herbicides, improved the percentage of Palmer amaranth control 11 to 17 percentage points over a single application, regardless of weed size at application 28 d after final application (DAFA). Palmer amaranth control with glufosinate followed by (fb) glufosinate and dicamba fb dicamba, pending weed size, were optimized at intervals of 7 d, and 14 to 21 d, respectively. Because single site of action (SOA) postemergence herbicide systems increase the likelihood of the development of resistant biotypes and are not a best management practice (BMP) in that regard; sequential applications involving both dicamba and glufosinate were more effective. Furthermore, the sequence of application mattered with a preference for applying dicamba first. Dicamba fb glufosinate at a 14-d interval was profit-maximizing and the only herbicide treatment that resulted in 100% weed control when size was <10 cm. For larger weed sizes, economic analysis revealed that dicamba fb dicamba performed better than dicamba fb glufosinate when no penalty was assigned for using a single SOA. This resulted in greater yield loss risk and soil weed seed bank in comparison to timelier weed control with the smaller weed size. Hence, timely weed control and two SOAs to control Palmer amaranth are recommended as BMPs that reduce producer risk. Nomenclature: dicamba; glufosinate; Palmer amaranth; Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Wats.; cotton; Gossypium hirsutum L.; soybean; Glycine max (L.) Merr.