Respiratory
Methods: Because there was still concern among some of the public and workers involved in the incident, an aetiological study was undertaken in 2006. Because the results of a previously self-administered questionnaire demonstrated that RADS was a possible sequela of exposure to the smoke, the study...
Saved in:
Published in | Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) Vol. 64; no. 12; p. e26 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
01.12.2007
BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Methods: Because there was still concern among some of the public and workers involved in the incident, an aetiological study was undertaken in 2006. Because the results of a previously self-administered questionnaire demonstrated that RADS was a possible sequela of exposure to the smoke, the study focused on RADS and started with an interview by telephone using a standardised questionnaire. Methods: From nine Alberta sawmills, 210 wood dust samples (inhalable) were collected with personal monitors using IOM (Institute of Occupational Medicine) sampler devices. Methods: This study is a part of a cross-sectional study on wood dust exposure and respiratory health effects in rubber wood sawmill workers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | local:oemed;64/12/e26 istex:8C088749C1ED27505C85375E3468BF9B21452CAB ArticleID:omepicoh07abs24 ark:/67375/NVC-3H0CM82W-D href:oemed-64-e26.pdf |
ISSN: | 1351-0711 1470-7926 |
DOI: | 10.1136/oem.64.12.e26 |