DIAGNOSIS OF SMALL FIBRE NEUROPATHIES–THE NEED TO GET THE BASICS RIGHT

This retrospective study characterised 98 patients with a clinical diagnosis of small fibre neuropathy and assessed how they were investigated against predefined internal standards, which were devised from literature search and determined to be those examinations and investigations that individuals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 84; no. 11; p. e2
Main Authors Johnston, Michael, Gosal, David Yunus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.11.2013
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This retrospective study characterised 98 patients with a clinical diagnosis of small fibre neuropathy and assessed how they were investigated against predefined internal standards, which were devised from literature search and determined to be those examinations and investigations that individuals with idiopathic small fibre neuropathy should have as a minimum. The internal standards devised were: all patients should have a documented thorough alcohol history, a full sensory examination, quantitative sensory threshold studies (thermal thresholds) and blood tests (oral glucose tolerance test, anti–nuclear antibodies, and serum protein electrophoresis at the very least). It was also recommended that all patients should have a confirmatory skin biopsy, however this service was not available and for practical reasons not included in the analysis. Patients were included if they had a history and examination consistent with SFN in the setting of normal nerve conduction studies. Only 21% of patients screened were investigated to the predefined standard. Only 71% had a documented alcohol history; 92% had a documented sensory examination; 83% had quantitative sensory tests; 36% of patients were tested with an oral glucose tolerance test and only 62% had a glucose test of any kind; 63% were tested for antinuclear antibodies and 59% were tested for protein electrophoresis. This data was reflected in the observation that a causative factor was only identified in 40% of patients diagnosed which seemed lower than most other reported patient cohorts. Conclusions Cases of suspected small fibre neuropathies need to be investigated in a more thorough manner and ideally in a specialist setting. Whereas ideally all patients diagnostic skin biopsy with estimation of the intraepidermal nerve fibre density should be performed, it is equally important to get the very basics right.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-140HPBTB-Z
local:jnnp;84/11/e2-dj
istex:21F01AC3BF09D1FE3B2322D26B7D68F90950E8D8
href:jnnp-84-e2-115.pdf
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3050
1468-330X
DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306573.201