419 Cost-effectivness and the role of diagnostic tools for screening early stages of endometrial cancer

ObjectivesAccording to the World Cancer Research Fund, over 380,000 new cases of endometrial cancer have been reported in 2018. After the identification of disease, histologic diagnosis is the main standard for managing further treatment approaches. The following analysis is aimed to examine cost-ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of gynecological cancer Vol. 29; no. Suppl 3; p. A174
Main Authors Radović, S, Potkonjak, AM, Jukić, M, Kličan, K, Vuković, A, Butorac, D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology 01.09.2019
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectivesAccording to the World Cancer Research Fund, over 380,000 new cases of endometrial cancer have been reported in 2018. After the identification of disease, histologic diagnosis is the main standard for managing further treatment approaches. The following analysis is aimed to examine cost-effectiveness of two preoperative endometrial sampling methods - hysteroscopy and curettage; comparing tumor localization, grading and staging in patients with endometrial cancer.MethodsThe differences in the specifications of 64 patients that underwent hysteroscopy or curettage in tertiary care center in Croatia were tested. According to five different guidelines, all cases of endometrial cancer were classified into groups of low risk, intermediate, high-intermediate or high risk. Statistical test used for analysis were Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, T-test ant the Z-test. Given data of 36 women who underwent hysteroscopy and 28 women who underwent curettage were analysed.ResultsOccurrence rates of Grade 1 and Grade 2 of endometrial cancer were higher in patients who underwent hysteroscopy (p=0.03572, p=0.03846) (picture 1). According to the classification of risk factors, no differences in incidence were found between two groups (picture 2).ConclusionsIn Croatia, the cervical dilation and curettage is a less-frequently used method despite being 62% more affordable than the hysteroscopy, while on the other hand, there is statistically significant difference in preferred choice of the two methods given the histologic grade of cancer and age at the time of diagnosis.
ISSN:1048-891X
1525-1438
DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2019-IGCS.419