G11 Tractography of the corpus callosum in Huntington disease

BackgroundRecent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies suggest that abnormalities in Huntington's disease (HD) extend to white matter (WM) tracts in early HD and even in presymptomatic (PreHD) stages. However, DTI tractography, which allows precise localisation of WM abnormalities has not yet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 83; no. Suppl 1; pp. A29 - A30
Main Authors Phillips, OR, Sanchez-Castaneda, C, Caltagirone, C, Di Pardo, A, Maglione, V, Squitieri, F, Sabatini, U, Di Paola, M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.09.2012
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundRecent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies suggest that abnormalities in Huntington's disease (HD) extend to white matter (WM) tracts in early HD and even in presymptomatic (PreHD) stages. However, DTI tractography, which allows precise localisation of WM abnormalities has not yet been used to investigate changes associated with HD.AimsThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether the corpus callosum (CC) of PreHD subjects exhibit a measurable difference compared to healthy controls and HD patients in the Forceps Major (posterior projections) and Minor (frontal projections).MethodsAll T1 and DTI data were acquired on a 3T Allegra MRI system (Siemens) for 33 healthy controls (22M/11F; age: 43.88±11.69), 19 PreHD subjects (13M/6F; age: 38.11±7.75) and 23 HD patients (13M/10F; age: 48.30±13.79). DTI scans were acquired with 30 directions and three acquisitions. The Forceps Major and Minor were delineated using predefined ROI's in TrackVis. The general linear model was used to compare tract volume with sex, age and CC volume included in the model.ResultsMean track volume for the FMajor: Controls=18.28±5.07, PreHD= 15.23±4.16, HD=13.98±4.16, and FMinor: Controls=14.90±4.21, PreHD=16.18±4.12, HD=11.60±4.08). Controls had a significantly larger FMajor compared to PreHD F[1,51]=6.534, p<0.02 and PreHD subjects had a significantly larger FMajor compared to HD patients F[1,42]=4.44, p <0.045. PreHD subjects had a significantly larger FMinor than HD Patients F[1,42]=13.261, p<002.ConclusionThe results suggest there is a significant difference in posterior and frontal CC projections between PreHD subjects and HD patients indicating a volume reduction associated with disease progression. Furthermore, PreHD subjects exhibit significantly smaller posterior projections compared to healthy controls but no significant difference in frontal projections, signalling a posterior-to-anterior direction in disease progression.
Bibliography:istex:BEF1C98A641645DCDA0277ACD95B526506EB2481
href:jnnp-83-A29-3.pdf
ark:/67375/NVC-MR24ZX4W-G
ArticleID:jnnp-2012-303524.91
local:jnnp;83/Suppl_1/A29-cm
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0022-3050
1468-330X
DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2012-303524.91