Audit of triage tools to recognise seriously ill children with fever: should we change?

Aims Evaluation of ‘NICE’ Traffic Light (NTL) assessment of febrile children and a tool1 based on abnormalities of one or more key vital signs (VS+). To aid to our department in identifying seriously ill children, including validation on a group of patients with meningococcal disease. Design Group (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of disease in childhood Vol. 96; no. Suppl 1; pp. A56 - A57
Main Authors Balogun, S, Boyd, C, Miller, C, Bowron, R, Mellon, A F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 01.04.2011
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims Evaluation of ‘NICE’ Traffic Light (NTL) assessment of febrile children and a tool1 based on abnormalities of one or more key vital signs (VS+). To aid to our department in identifying seriously ill children, including validation on a group of patients with meningococcal disease. Design Group (1) Children with fever >38°C in (a) Paediatric Emergency Department (PED) or (b) Walk-In-Centre (WIC) January 2010, Group (2) Children with meningococcal disease (2006–2009). Data was collected at time of presentation to categorise into red, amber or green (NTL), and to establish as VS+ or VS-. Outcome measures: (1) Referral from WIC (including self referral) or PED for further care. (2) Sensitivity and specificity of NTL and VS for serious/intermediate infection. Results Data was analysed from 133 children (30 WIC, 31 PED, 36 meningococcal); 38.8% under 1 year old, 7.4% over 11 years. WIC: 63.5% were categorised green using NTL. 23.4% of these patients were either referred or later presented to PED/GP, whereas 6.7% were categorised red, none of whom were referred. 47% VS+ were referred compared to 16.7% VS-. PED: 50% were NTL green, 11.1% admitted to the ward for treatment. 13.4% were red, 50% admitted. 28% VS+ and 7.1% VS- were admitted. Abstract G115 Table 1 Vital signs vs Meningococcal disease. Categories Sensitivity Specificity WIC NTL(R/A) 80 80 WIC VS+ 80 44 PED NTL(R/A) 73.9 80 PED VS+ 60.9 50 Meningococcal NTL(R/A) 91.7 – Meningococcal VS+ 88.9 – Meningococcal NTL & VS+ 100 – Meningococcal: 91.7% were categorised as red/amber, 8% as green but with three abnormal VS out of four. Four patients who were VS- were ‘red’ using NTL. Conclusion NTL and VS have similar sensitivity and specificity for serious illness and may have a valid role in some primary and secondary care settings. Three versus four (8% vs 11%) with meningococcal disease would have been under-triaged based on NTL/VS alone. VS may be more useful in primary care than NTL and add value to NTL in assessing febrile children with higher prevalence of serious illness presenting in secondary care.
Bibliography:ArticleID:archdischild212563.129
ark:/67375/NVC-6HCJ0LMB-6
istex:5C36A263B9F94DB09892D265D15A2BD5FA477548
href:archdischild-96-A56-3.pdf
local:archdischild;96/Suppl_1/A56-c
ISSN:0003-9888
1468-2044
DOI:10.1136/adc.2011.212563.129