418 A Delphi process to determine clinicians’ attitudes and beliefs towards paediatric major incident triage within the United Kingdom

AimsTriage is a key principle in the effective management of major incidents, yet there is a paucity of evidence surrounding the optimal method of paediatric major incident triage (MIT). This study aimed to derive consensus on key components of paediatric MIT among healthcare professionals involved...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of disease in childhood Vol. 107; no. Suppl 2; pp. A10 - A11
Main Authors Vassallo, James, Blakey, Sarah, Cowburn, Philip, Surridge, Julia, Smith, Jason, Scholefield, Barney, Lyttle, Mark
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 01.08.2022
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-9888
1468-2044
DOI10.1136/archdischild-2022-rcpch.17

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AimsTriage is a key principle in the effective management of major incidents, yet there is a paucity of evidence surrounding the optimal method of paediatric major incident triage (MIT). This study aimed to derive consensus on key components of paediatric MIT among healthcare professionals involved in the management of paediatric major incidents.MethodsThis modified two-round online Delphi consensus study, delivered between July and October 2021, included participants from pre-hospital and hospital specialities involved in managing a paediatric major incident. Statements were derived iteratively based on review of MIT tools, and extant literature. A 5-point Likert agreement scale was used to determine consensus, which was set a priori at 70%.Results111 clinicians completed both rounds, with 13 of 17 statements reaching consensus. Positive consensus was reached on the use of rescue breaths in mechanisms associated with hypoxia or asphyxiation, use of mobility assessment as a crude discriminator of injury, and use of adult physiology for older children. Whilst positive consensus was reached on the benefits of a single MIT tool for use across the entire adult and paediatric age range, there was negative consensus in relation to the clinical implementation of such a tool. Consensus could not be reached regarding the use of a single tool across the whole paediatric age range specifically, nor on the use of rescue breaths in blunt or penetrating trauma.ConclusionThis Delphi study has established consensus among a large group of subject matter experts on several key elements of paediatric MIT. Further work is required to develop a triage tool that can be implemented based on emerging and ongoing research, and which is acceptable to clinicians.
Bibliography:Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Abstracts of the RCPCH Conference, Liverpool, 28–30 June 2022
Association of Paediatric Emergency Medicine
ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0003-9888
1468-2044
DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2022-rcpch.17