P18 Effectiveness of home bowel preparation for children living long distances from endoscopy centre

IntroductionThe North of Scotland Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Network (NoSPGHANN) manages children over an area of 53,000 km2. Travel distances to Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital (RACH) were previously felt to preclude the adoption of home bowel preparation (HBP) for ele...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontline gastroenterology Vol. 12; no. Suppl 1; p. A22
Main Authors Motion, Jamie, Sutherland, Malcolm, Smart, Brenda, Cameron, Carol, Kishore, Shyla, Chalmers, Iain, Bunn, Su
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.04.2021
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:IntroductionThe North of Scotland Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Network (NoSPGHANN) manages children over an area of 53,000 km2. Travel distances to Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital (RACH) were previously felt to preclude the adoption of home bowel preparation (HBP) for elective colonoscopies but a trial period of HBP commenced in March 2020. The same drugs (senna and Picolax) were used for inpatient bowel preparation (IPBP) or HBP but the timings were changed for HBP to complete all doses on the day prior to procedure to allow travel to RACH. This audit evaluates the impact of this change of practice.MethodsAll children undergoing elective colonoscopy at RACH between December 2019 and November 2020 were identified. Electronic were records reviewed to determine IPBP vs HBP, distance to RACH from patient’s home, bowel preparation score, morning or afternoon list, requirement for intravenous (IV) fluids during the procedure, day case procedure and length of stay. Bowel preparation score was derived from the Aronchick Scale and converted as follows: 0 (unacceptable), 1 (poor), 2 (fair), 3 (good) and 4 (excellent).ResultsSummaryThe high standard of bowel preparation achieved with IPBP was maintained when delivered at home, despite some children travelling >100 miles and having travelling times of >3 hours. Delivering all doses of drugs on the day before procedure did not affect the quality of bowel preparation for afternoon lists. There is a trend to a higher proportion of children with HBP receiving IV fluids during anaesthetic which may suggest that some are dehydrated. The proportion of day case procedures has increased from 0% to 72%, which since March 2020, has saved NHS Grampian £18,000.ConclusionHome bowel preparation delivered on day prior to procedure is well tolerated and as effective as inpatient delivered, even for children with long travelling times to hospital. Covid-19 distancing measures have reduced the number of available inpatient beds so HBP has aided bed management in addition to providing a cost saving. The risk of dehydration may be higher for HBP and guidance will be changed to increase the emphasis on oral fluid intake, including during travelling time, on day of procedure.
ISSN:2041-4137
2041-4145
DOI:10.1136/flgastro-2021-bspghan.28