5PSQ-037 Peripheral blood biomarkers dynamics predict clinical response to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Background and ImportanceHeterogeneity in response to immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) highlights the need to identify predictive biomarkers. Peripheral blood biomarkers have been associated with the prognosis in advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy.Aim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy. Science and practice Vol. 31; no. Suppl 1; p. A180
Main Authors Lora, S, Jiménez-Galán, R, Prado-Mel, E, Vega-Coca, MD, Pérez-Moreno, MA, Abdel-Kader Martín, L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London British Medical Journal Publishing Group 20.03.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and ImportanceHeterogeneity in response to immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) highlights the need to identify predictive biomarkers. Peripheral blood biomarkers have been associated with the prognosis in advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy.Aim and ObjectivesTo analyse the correlation between the response to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and peripheral blood biomarker dynamics in patients with non-squamous metastatic NSCLC.Material and MethodsRetrospective and observational study including all patients treated with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed plus platinum-based chemotherapy from January 2020 to December 2021. Variables collected: sex, age, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale, and lymphocyte, neutrophil and eosinophil absolute counts (ALC, ANC and AEC, respectively) at three timepoints: baseline (before treatment), week 4 of treatment and first computerised tomography (CT) scan. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was calculated for each timepoint. Patients were classified as responders (partial response or stable disease) or non-responders (progression at first CT scan). Statistical analysis was performed with software SPSS 24.0.ResultsSixty patients were included76.7% were male with a median age of 62 years. 88.3% presented baseline ECOG <2 and 76.7% of patients were categorised as responders (23.3% non-responders). Baseline NLR was similar between responders and non-responders. Median NLR at week 4 was significantly higher in non-responders (3.3 vs 1.99; p=0.04). Median NLR at first CT scan was also significantly higher in non-responders (3.5 vs 1.9; p=0.01). Among responders, there was a significant decrease (p<0.01) between baseline NRL and at time of first CT, while non-significant changes were found in the non-responder group. ANC was similar at baseline and first CT among responders and non-responders. However, there were significant differences at week 4 (p=0.036). Regarding ALC, significant differences were only found between both groups at first CT (p=0.015). Finally, for AEC, we did not find significant differences at any of the measured timepoints.Conclusion and RelevanceOur results suggest that NLR behaves as a predictive biomarker of response to immunotherapy. ANC showed significant differences among responders and non-responders at week 4, and ALC at the first evaluation. AEC did not show correlation with response.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest.
Bibliography:28th EAHP Congress, Bordeaux, France, 20-21-22 March 2024
ISSN:2047-9956
2047-9964
DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-eahp.371