P29 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance is vital in the management of cardiology inpatients

ObjectiveCardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a highly versatile imaging modality, indicated in the assessment of most common cardiac presentations. The EuroCMR registry showed that CMR impacts patient management in the majority of cases but did not specifically investigate inpatients. In this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 108; no. Suppl 2; pp. A12 - A13
Main Authors Hampal, Rumneek, Knott, Kristopher, Plastiras, Aristides, Nikolou, Evgenia, Bunce, Nicholas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 21.09.2022
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectiveCardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a highly versatile imaging modality, indicated in the assessment of most common cardiac presentations. The EuroCMR registry showed that CMR impacts patient management in the majority of cases but did not specifically investigate inpatients. In this single UK tertiary centre study, we reviewed the impact of CMR on inpatient management.MethodsInpatients who had a CMR scan between June-December 2021 were identified. Data collected included demographics, indication for CMR, CMR findings and whether patient management changed following the result.ResultsThere were 169 patients included within the study period – 66% were male, mean age was 57.1 years. Primary indications for CMR included assessment of cardiomyopathies (53% patients), myocardial viability (17%) and ischaemia (12%). Inpatient CMR led to a complete change in diagnosis in 29% patients. The commonest diagnosis post-CMR was ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (34%). Non-ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction was found in 23% scans, cardiomyopathy was detected in 12% and myocarditis was diagnosed in 11%. Of note, 19 patients (11%) had a normal scan. CMR changed patient management in 80% cases. This included medication changes, further procedures (e.g.CRT/ICD) or hospital discharge. In 6 cases, invasive coronary angiography was not performed due to the CMR result. CMR was non-diagnostic in 5 (3%) cases.ConclusionIn this single tertiary centre study we found that CMR impacted upon clinical management 80% of the time. CMR is a vital tool in the management of cardiology inpatients particularly in the assessment of IHD, heart failure, cardiomyopathy and myocarditis.
Bibliography:British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Annual Meeting, Bath, 2022
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2022-BSCI.34